Demographics & Economics
OMB
Congressional Budget Office
The Federal Budget
U.S. Census Quickfacts
Inflation Calculator
CIA World Factbook
NationMaster
State Healthcare Facts
UN HDR stats
US Bureau of Economic Analysis
US Bureau of Labor Statistics
US CDC health stats
US DOJ Bureau of Justice Statistics
US DOJ crime stats
Constitution
The Constitution
The Founders' Constitution
The Avalon Project
The Federalist Papers
The antifederalist papers
Founding documents
Politics
ADA (liberal) Voting Records
ACU (conservative) Voting Records
Census Voter Turnout
Congressional Research Service
Memeorandum
NOW list of voting scorecards
PolitiFact
PorkBusters
Project VoteSmart list of voting scorecards
RealClearPolitics
Roll call votes--House
Roll call votes--Senate
Survey USA
WaPo Votes Database
Iraq/Terrorism
CentCom
Brookings Institute Iraq Index
Project on Defense Alternatives War Report
Nat'l Defense Univ Iraq
Nat'l Defense Univ Afghanistan
MERLIN, Nat'l Defense Univ Library Network
STRATFOR
Nat'l Memorial Inst for Prevention of Terrorism
West Point's Combating Terrorism Center
Politics blogs
Baldilocks
Blue Mass Group
Cadillac Tight
California Conservative
Jon Chait
Confederate Yankee
Crooked Timber
Democracy Project
Dinocrat
First Read
Gateway Pundit
GenerationPatriot
Horse Race Blog
Just One Minute
Hugh Hewitt
Michelle Malkin
Patterico's Pontifications
Power Line
Red State
RNCC blog
Scrappleface
Sister Toldjah
Talking Points Memo
The Blogometer
The Corner
The Next Right
The Moderate Voice
Think Progress
Wizbang
Moderate / centrist
Ambivablog
Bipartisan Rules
Booker Rising
Centerfield
Charging RINO
Donklephant
Liberal War Journal
Militant Moderates
The Buck Stops Here
The Glittering Eye
The Iconic Midwest
The PoliGazette
The Walrus Said
Legal & academic
How Appealing
Becker-Posner
Bench Memos
Concurring Opinions
Economists Do It With Models
Legalities
Prawfsblawg
SCOTUSblog
Sentencing Law & Policy
UCFB
The Volokh Conspiracy
Christian
Archbp Dolan: Gospel in the Digital Age
Bp Chris Coyne: Let Us Walk Together
ADW blog
Simon Dodd: Motu Proprio
Fr Zuhlsdorf: WDTPRS
Fr Longenecker: Standing On My Head
Elizabeth Scalia: The Anchoress
First Thoughts
Mirror of Justice
Rorate Cæli
Veritas Rex
Middle East & Muslim affairs
Eteraz
Iraq the Model
Lebanese Political Journal
Michael Totten
Michael Yon
General interest
Althouse
Ambiance
Chris Muir's Day by Day
Instapundit
IowaHawk
JAC
Professor Bainbridge
Prettier than Napoleon
Rachel Lucas
The Right Coast
Science Blog
Sippican Cottage
Whatever
A little reminder: Prior to Barry Goldwater's revolution within the party, the party had a different flavor. Reagan continued that trend and some Reagan democrats stayed.
Steve Forbes ran on tax reform and helped make that an issue in the party.
Tom Tancredo was a one-issue guy: and he beamed at one of the debates that "they're all trying to out-Tancredo Tancredo" in reference to the border-tightening one upmanship.
Also this season, Ron Paul, within the context of the existing party, got several chances to advance fiscal conservatism, making government smaller and less intrusive in citizen's lives and a humble foreign policy. He advanced the libertarian wing of the party a good deal.
Pat Buchanan, on the other hand, left the party and went off into irrelevance and a dismal showing in the--what was it?--Constitution Party.
You advance your ideas by working within your party for change. You convince enough people [and it's mathematically easier to win primaries in a party than as a third party] because of the soundness of your ideas and selling it to the voters who show up.
I'm not sure that Forbes made tax reform an issue beyond his own view of how it should be done (it goes back at least to Goldwater and probably beyond) but beyond that, it can't be repeated often enough. Third parties don't work in America unless they aim to (and do) quickly and permanently displace the second party.
Third parties don't succeed
Third parties don't succeed at winning elections for themselves. They quite often "work" in terms of swaying elections, however, as the last two decades shows quite clearly.
Although they succeed in
Although they succeed in swaying elections against the interests of the people who are (sincerely) backing the third party. Thus Nader gave his supporters Bush and Perot gave his supporters Clinton.
You bet. Pointing this out
You bet. Pointing this out to third-party supporters will get you nowhere, of course. :-)
I think people who support a
I think people who support a third party though are taking a longer view-thinking that even if they throw the election to the party that is furthest from their ideology, then eventually the party that was their natural base will move toward their preferred position.
I think third parties form when you get a mixture of people like that (I think Nader himself expressed that this was his motivation in 2000, didn't he?), along with those who feel that voting is some sort of exercise of conscience (so they have to find a choice they can pick without reservations), plus naive (mostly young) voters who actually don't realize that the third party doesn't have a chance.
But is that idea any
But is that idea any different to the one I expressed doubt about here?