StubbornFacts
Stubborn Facts
Stubborn Facts

Navigation

User login

Subscribe via RSS

Resources

The latest from our partner, the PoliGazette

Blog Roll

Sow, Reap

Submitted by Tully on Mon, 07/02/2007 - 11:49am

Florida election mayhem for 2008
How the home of hanging chads, Katherine Harris and butterfly ballots is shaking up the Democratic primary

Last summer, the Democratic National Committee, in the name of regional, racial and ethnic diversity, anointed four small states for special treatment in picking a nominee by barring all other states from holding caucuses or primaries in January 2008. According to the DNC calendar, the presidential race would begin with the Iowa caucuses as it has for three decades (Jan. 14), continue with the newly upgraded Nevada caucuses (Jan. 19), the traditional New Hampshire primary (Jan. 22), and then go to the South Carolina primary (Jan. 29), which had been moved up in 2004 to add a state with a heavy African-American vote to the mix.

The new schedule had major flaws --- an earlier than ever starting date and the unnecessary insertion of Nevada (Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's home state) ahead of New Hampshire, a state that zealously guards its first-in-the-nation primary. But it did give the presidential candidates a chance to prove their mettle in four diverse and affordable states before being confronted with Super Dooper Party Pooper Tuesday on Feb. 5, when nearly half the voters in the nation (including those in California, New York and Illinois) are slated to cast primary ballots.

....But everything changed when Florida moved its primary as part of an overall electoral reform bill, which won unanimous Democratic support in the legislature because it also eliminated touch-screen voting. A binding Jan. 29 Florida primary is an explicit violation of DNC rules and should automatically trigger sanctions that would take away half the state's convention delegates and penalize candidates for campaigning there. That is the theory anyway -- and the DNC, from chairman Howard Dean on down, will continue to publicly cling to this position until the party's Rules Committee takes up the Florida mess at its late August meeting.

The practical problem is that no political party in its right mind wants to penalize Florida, one of the must-win states for both parties in the 2008 election. Imagine TV cameras at a Democratic Convention panning the empty seats in the Florida delegation. If a Republican-dominated state like Utah or even Texas violated the DNC rules, it is a safe bet that they would be enforced to the hilt. But Florida is different, and it is the state that proves that, as a Democratic Party insider put it, "the emperor has no clothes."

But the circus is always fun to watch.

Previous:

The DNC: Making Every Vote Not Count!
Dun duh duh...

And there are still people

And there are still people wondering here why Charlie and the Legislature were so gung-ho on moving it up. ;) The Dems should not be complaining. They also got rid of the touch screen voting in Florida with that little maneuver.

The story is absolutely right, though. I suspect the DNC will give a slap on the wrist and reduce the delegate size by 10%. Maybe 20 or 30% at the most. The only other choice for them is to do everything to caucuses. Not something they want to do in this state.

The worst part about this, though, is the fact the people of Florida will now be subjected to political ads over Christmas. I am going to miss seeing Santa sledding on his Norelco.

I still get a serious case

I still get a serious case of the irony-giggles at the idea of the Dems disenfrachising their own, and in FLORIDA at that. Delicious.

The GOP is no more anxious to punish Florida than the Dems are, but they at least have the excuse that they weren't the ones who inspired it by diddling the primary schedule.

Recent comments

Advertisements
StubbornFacts.us does not endorse the content of any advertisement

Featured Movie

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 2 guests online.