Demographics & Economics
OMB
Congressional Budget Office
The Federal Budget
U.S. Census Quickfacts
Inflation Calculator
CIA World Factbook
NationMaster
State Healthcare Facts
UN HDR stats
US Bureau of Economic Analysis
US Bureau of Labor Statistics
US CDC health stats
US DOJ Bureau of Justice Statistics
US DOJ crime stats
Constitution
The Constitution
The Founders' Constitution
The Avalon Project
The Federalist Papers
The antifederalist papers
Founding documents
Politics
ADA (liberal) Voting Records
ACU (conservative) Voting Records
Census Voter Turnout
Congressional Research Service
Memeorandum
NOW list of voting scorecards
PolitiFact
PorkBusters
Project VoteSmart list of voting scorecards
RealClearPolitics
Roll call votes--House
Roll call votes--Senate
Survey USA
WaPo Votes Database
Iraq/Terrorism
CentCom
Brookings Institute Iraq Index
Project on Defense Alternatives War Report
Nat'l Defense Univ Iraq
Nat'l Defense Univ Afghanistan
MERLIN, Nat'l Defense Univ Library Network
STRATFOR
Nat'l Memorial Inst for Prevention of Terrorism
West Point's Combating Terrorism Center
Politics blogs
Baldilocks
Blue Mass Group
Cadillac Tight
California Conservative
Jon Chait
Confederate Yankee
Crooked Timber
Democracy Project
Dinocrat
First Read
Gateway Pundit
GenerationPatriot
Horse Race Blog
Just One Minute
Hugh Hewitt
Michelle Malkin
Patterico's Pontifications
Power Line
Red State
RNCC blog
Scrappleface
Sister Toldjah
Talking Points Memo
The Blogometer
The Corner
The Next Right
The Moderate Voice
Think Progress
Wizbang
Moderate / centrist
Ambivablog
Bipartisan Rules
Booker Rising
Centerfield
Charging RINO
Donklephant
Liberal War Journal
Militant Moderates
The Buck Stops Here
The Glittering Eye
The Iconic Midwest
The PoliGazette
The Walrus Said
Legal & academic
How Appealing
Becker-Posner
Bench Memos
Concurring Opinions
Economists Do It With Models
Legalities
Prawfsblawg
SCOTUSblog
Sentencing Law & Policy
UCFB
The Volokh Conspiracy
Christian
Archbp Dolan: Gospel in the Digital Age
Bp Chris Coyne: Let Us Walk Together
ADW blog
Simon Dodd: Motu Proprio
Fr Zuhlsdorf: WDTPRS
Fr Longenecker: Standing On My Head
Elizabeth Scalia: The Anchoress
First Thoughts
Mirror of Justice
Rorate Cæli
Veritas Rex
Middle East & Muslim affairs
Eteraz
Iraq the Model
Lebanese Political Journal
Michael Totten
Michael Yon
General interest
Althouse
Ambiance
Chris Muir's Day by Day
Instapundit
IowaHawk
JAC
Professor Bainbridge
Prettier than Napoleon
Rachel Lucas
The Right Coast
Science Blog
Sippican Cottage
Whatever
David Brooks asks us to cast our eyes across the pond, and be influenced by what is happening in Britain, vis-a-vis the Tories. He points to their recent electoral success (we noted that here, and I've been meaning to write a post replying to it all week - this isn't it, but maybe this weekend time will permit), and contrasts our continuing electoral woes.
Brooks must be careful, however, not to oversell Tory success. And that limits the force of the argument that we should learn from what they did "right" - no pun intended. Are their fortunes improving because they did something "right" (even assuming that politics isn't contextual and that there are globally "right" answers)? British conservatives may be on the way up because the other side of the seesaw is on the way down: the election, it seems to me, far more clearly expressed frustration and discontent with Labour than it expressed approbation for conservative policies old or new. If there's a lesson for either American political party here, it's not one that Republicans can take advantage of, and one that Democrats can no longer take advantage of. It's this: when the public hates the incumbent, make it easy for the public to use you as a tool with which to assail the incumbent. That's what happened in this country two years ago: America far more squarely rejected us than it embraced the Democrats.
Brooks acknowledges this, kinda sorta: "[i]t’s not only that voters are tired of Labor," he says: it's that "[t]he Conservatives have successfully 'decontaminated' their brand," thereby providing an outlet. Thus, with the left/center-left vote split between Labour and the Liberal Democrats, a unified and minimally credible party on the center-right ought to be able to clean up. The same prescription only applies when the same conditions hold; they don't - quite apart from all the micro-level differences, more broadly-speaking the American polity is simply nothing like Britain's - so we should be interested in what the Tories are doing, but it should be taken with a grain of salt.
yeah
Yeah, they're about eight years behind us in the left/right cycle.
My politics are pretty close to where Blair/Brown started out, and was pretty happy with them until they had more and more corruption, and took away more and more rights.
I would never've pulled the lever for them a third time; dunno if I would've gone LibDem or Tory.