Demographics & Economics
OMB
Congressional Budget Office
The Federal Budget
U.S. Census Quickfacts
Inflation Calculator
CIA World Factbook
NationMaster
State Healthcare Facts
UN HDR stats
US Bureau of Economic Analysis
US Bureau of Labor Statistics
US CDC health stats
US DOJ Bureau of Justice Statistics
US DOJ crime stats
Constitution
The Constitution
The Founders' Constitution
The Avalon Project
The Federalist Papers
The antifederalist papers
Founding documents
Politics
ADA (liberal) Voting Records
ACU (conservative) Voting Records
Census Voter Turnout
Congressional Research Service
Memeorandum
NOW list of voting scorecards
PolitiFact
PorkBusters
Project VoteSmart list of voting scorecards
RealClearPolitics
Roll call votes--House
Roll call votes--Senate
Survey USA
WaPo Votes Database
Iraq/Terrorism
CentCom
Brookings Institute Iraq Index
Project on Defense Alternatives War Report
Nat'l Defense Univ Iraq
Nat'l Defense Univ Afghanistan
MERLIN, Nat'l Defense Univ Library Network
STRATFOR
Nat'l Memorial Inst for Prevention of Terrorism
West Point's Combating Terrorism Center
Politics blogs
Baldilocks
Blue Mass Group
Cadillac Tight
California Conservative
Jon Chait
Confederate Yankee
Crooked Timber
Democracy Project
Dinocrat
First Read
Gateway Pundit
GenerationPatriot
Horse Race Blog
Just One Minute
Hugh Hewitt
Michelle Malkin
Patterico's Pontifications
Power Line
Red State
RNCC blog
Scrappleface
Talking Points Memo
The Blogometer
The Corner
The Next Right
The Moderate Voice
Think Progress
Wizbang
Moderate / centrist
Ambivablog
Bipartisan Rules
Booker Rising
Centerfield
Charging RINO
Donklephant
Liberal War Journal
Militant Moderates
The Buck Stops Here
The Glittering Eye
The Iconic Midwest
The PoliGazette
The Walrus Said
Legal & blawgs
How Appealing
Becker-Posner
Bench Memos
Concurring Opinions
Law & Letters
Legalities
Prawfsblawg
SCOTUSblog
Sentencing Law & Policy
The Volokh Conspiracy
Christian
ADW blog
Father Z
First Thoughts
Mirror of Justice
Veritas Rex
Middle East & Muslim affairs
Eteraz
Iraq the Model
Lebanese Political Journal
Michael Totten
Michael Yon
General interest
Althouse
Ambiance
Chris Muir's Day by Day
Instapundit
IowaHawk
JAC
Professor Bainbridge
Prettier than Napoleon
Rachel Lucas
The Right Coast
Science Blog
Sippican Cottage
The Anchoress
Whatever
Having linked to Jon Henke's criticism of Huckabee's book, it seems only fair to link to this interview with Huckabee, wherein he acquits himself much better than I would have expected. I'm still skeptical, but perhaps his book may be worth a read after all.
It was a good interview
I've always thought he speaks well and I've never thought him "simplistic". That really does touch on a meme out there (that frankly crosses party lines) that "if you're a 'Christian' politician you're a 'thoughtless' politician".
What I didn't hear in his interview (and maybe I'll have to read the book) is how does the government encourage or enforce those personal values. I would bet that's where libertarian Republicans get a bit anxious (i.e. "Uh oh they're about to tell me how to live"). Along those lines, here's an issue that I'd love to hear a coherent conservative message on: "CEO salaries". Is there anything beyond the bully pulpit that the government can/should do to "encourage" more "reasonable" top management salaries? I truly abhor the dollars but at the same time reflexively feel that its a business's right to run itself at it sees fit. And if that means overpaying their CEO then so be it. Huckabee seemed to allude to doing something regarding the composition of or procedures of corporate boards.
Chris
Flavors of libertarianism
chris,
Its meaningful to note that even though libertarians talk about themselves as having a consistent ideology, within libertarians there are a number of different views on social issues.
There are some libertarians, like Ron Paul, who don't think there's a conflict with principles of freedom and equality and laws on abortion and gay marriage. To Ron Paul, you can make a law against abortion just like you can make a law against murder, and you can establish a type of contract for heterosexual couples without violating rights for homosexual couples. They don't see a contradiction between social conservativism and libertarian philosophy.
Other libertarians don't believe in social conservative policies but believe, like social conservativces do, that the court is activist when they declare that the Constitution disallows laws on abortion or requires that marriage rights be granted to gay couples. They might be supporting liberal positions on these types of policies, but support a conservative, strict constructionist, position on the role of the courts.
Then there are libertarians who find themselves agreeing with liberal justices on the point that the Constitution created a government with limited rights, and the government has some restrictions on it that aren't specifically spelled out in the text. They point to the 9th and 10th amendments.
Finally, there are also libertarians who handle the issues of states rights in different ways. Some look at libertarianism as a form of anti-federalism and simply want to reduce the power of the federal government on these issues and not the state governments. Others may want to reduce the power of all government, but don't think the federal Constitution should have sway over state governments; they may not agree that restrictions for the federal government should be incorporated for the state governments. Yet some others think state government power should be restricted, but think that some issues are okay at an even more local municipal level.
And with the Libertarian Party having infighting between its different factions on the nomination of Bob Barr, maybe we don't only need to define a Conservativism 2.0 , but also a Libertarianism 2.0.