Demographics & Economics
OMB
Congressional Budget Office
The Federal Budget
U.S. Census Quickfacts
Inflation Calculator
CIA World Factbook
NationMaster
State Healthcare Facts
UN HDR stats
US Bureau of Economic Analysis
US Bureau of Labor Statistics
US CDC health stats
US DOJ Bureau of Justice Statistics
US DOJ crime stats
Constitution
The Constitution
The Founders' Constitution
The Avalon Project
The Federalist Papers
The antifederalist papers
Founding documents
Politics
ADA (liberal) Voting Records
ACU (conservative) Voting Records
Census Voter Turnout
Congressional Research Service
Memeorandum
NOW list of voting scorecards
PolitiFact
PorkBusters
Project VoteSmart list of voting scorecards
RealClearPolitics
Roll call votes--House
Roll call votes--Senate
Survey USA
WaPo Votes Database
Iraq/Terrorism
CentCom
Brookings Institute Iraq Index
Project on Defense Alternatives War Report
Nat'l Defense Univ Iraq
Nat'l Defense Univ Afghanistan
MERLIN, Nat'l Defense Univ Library Network
STRATFOR
Nat'l Memorial Inst for Prevention of Terrorism
West Point's Combating Terrorism Center
Politics blogs
Baldilocks
Blue Mass Group
Cadillac Tight
California Conservative
Jon Chait
Confederate Yankee
Crooked Timber
Democracy Project
Dinocrat
First Read
Gateway Pundit
GenerationPatriot
Horse Race Blog
Just One Minute
Hugh Hewitt
Michelle Malkin
Patterico's Pontifications
Power Line
Red State
RNCC blog
Scrappleface
Sister Toldjah
Talking Points Memo
The Blogometer
The Corner
The Next Right
The Moderate Voice
Think Progress
Wizbang
Moderate / centrist
Ambivablog
Bipartisan Rules
Booker Rising
Centerfield
Charging RINO
Donklephant
Liberal War Journal
Militant Moderates
The Buck Stops Here
The Glittering Eye
The Iconic Midwest
The PoliGazette
The Walrus Said
Legal & academic
How Appealing
Becker-Posner
Bench Memos
Concurring Opinions
Economists Do It With Models
Legalities
Prawfsblawg
SCOTUSblog
Sentencing Law & Policy
UCFB
The Volokh Conspiracy
Christian
Archbp Dolan: Gospel in the Digital Age
Bp Chris Coyne: Let Us Walk Together
ADW blog
Simon Dodd: Motu Proprio
Fr Zuhlsdorf: WDTPRS
Fr Longenecker: Standing On My Head
Elizabeth Scalia: The Anchoress
First Thoughts
Mirror of Justice
Rorate Cæli
Veritas Rex
Middle East & Muslim affairs
Eteraz
Iraq the Model
Lebanese Political Journal
Michael Totten
Michael Yon
General interest
Althouse
Ambiance
Chris Muir's Day by Day
Instapundit
IowaHawk
JAC
Professor Bainbridge
Prettier than Napoleon
Rachel Lucas
The Right Coast
Science Blog
Sippican Cottage
Whatever
We're not likely to be a hotbed of late-breaking election news tonight, but here's an open thread to talk about the results as they come in. Here's a couple of tidbits to get you started.
Over at NRO's The Campaign Spot, Jim Geraghty reports on some initial reaction to the exit polls:
I am told that one Democratic strategist, helping a television network with Election Night analysis, just declared that the Democrats were experiencing something on par with mass murder.
More seriously, I think everybody committed to sane, rational political discourse in this country should read John Fund's Requiem for the Pelosi Democrats, which appeared in the Wall Street Journal the other day. Pay particular question to the admissions of retiring Representative Brian Baird (D-WA). He clearly saw the overreaches and missteps being made by his party's leadership... but he did nothing about it. He still voted for all of those excesses. He voted for cap and trade, for health care, for financial regulatory reform, even though, as he says now, he saw that they didn't do a lot to help some of the key problems (wondering in particular why the latter didn't address Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and why those two federally-owned entities were so involved in the political process to begin with).
Both Democrats and Republicans need to take a close look and learn some lessons from Mr. Baird's confessions. The Democrats because it tells them just where they screwed up (like the Republicans after 1994, they got drunk with power and started rewarding their constituencies rather than governing responsibly), the Republicans because it tells them where they're most at risk of screwing up. The Republicans will have their own share of Mr. Bairds, who will see serious flaws in legislation, yet still vocally support the bills and the Congressional party leadership. The new Republicans should not let themselves fall into the same trap. Yes, compromises are part of governing and politics... but those compromises should be open and honest and PUBLIC. If a bill being pushed by the party truly fails to address a crucial issue, then it is the responsibility of all members to speak up about that bill and the problem, and to try to make it better. And if the party leadership keeps making the same obvious mistakes over and over... STOP VOTING FOR THEM. To hell with having the good office or getting some nice pork for your district back home. Your constituents will respect you if you speak your mind and stand up for principles.
And just to be clear, I recommend this article not to praise Mr. Baird, but to criticize him. Fools, used and manipulated by others without realizing what's really going on, are bad enough. Mr. Baird saw the problems, but was too weak-willed to stand up to his party leadership and for his principles. Shame on him... and let his lessons be a cautionary tale for all new Members of Congress.