Demographics & Economics
OMB
Congressional Budget Office
The Federal Budget
U.S. Census Quickfacts
Inflation Calculator
CIA World Factbook
NationMaster
State Healthcare Facts
UN HDR stats
US Bureau of Economic Analysis
US Bureau of Labor Statistics
US CDC health stats
US DOJ Bureau of Justice Statistics
US DOJ crime stats
Constitution
The Constitution
The Founders' Constitution
The Avalon Project
The Federalist Papers
The antifederalist papers
Founding documents
Politics
ADA (liberal) Voting Records
ACU (conservative) Voting Records
Census Voter Turnout
Congressional Research Service
Memeorandum
NOW list of voting scorecards
PolitiFact
PorkBusters
Project VoteSmart list of voting scorecards
RealClearPolitics
Roll call votes--House
Roll call votes--Senate
Survey USA
WaPo Votes Database
Iraq/Terrorism
CentCom
Brookings Institute Iraq Index
Project on Defense Alternatives War Report
Nat'l Defense Univ Iraq
Nat'l Defense Univ Afghanistan
MERLIN, Nat'l Defense Univ Library Network
STRATFOR
Nat'l Memorial Inst for Prevention of Terrorism
West Point's Combating Terrorism Center
Politics blogs
Baldilocks
Blue Mass Group
Cadillac Tight
California Conservative
Jon Chait
Confederate Yankee
Crooked Timber
Democracy Project
Dinocrat
First Read
Gateway Pundit
GenerationPatriot
Horse Race Blog
Just One Minute
Hugh Hewitt
Michelle Malkin
Patterico's Pontifications
Power Line
Red State
RNCC blog
Scrappleface
Sister Toldjah
Talking Points Memo
The Blogometer
The Corner
The Next Right
The Moderate Voice
Think Progress
Wizbang
Moderate / centrist
Ambivablog
Bipartisan Rules
Booker Rising
Centerfield
Charging RINO
Donklephant
Liberal War Journal
Militant Moderates
The Buck Stops Here
The Glittering Eye
The Iconic Midwest
The PoliGazette
The Walrus Said
Legal & academic
How Appealing
Becker-Posner
Bench Memos
Concurring Opinions
Economists Do It With Models
Legalities
Prawfsblawg
SCOTUSblog
Sentencing Law & Policy
UCFB
The Volokh Conspiracy
Christian
Archbp Dolan: Gospel in the Digital Age
Bp Chris Coyne: Let Us Walk Together
ADW blog
Simon Dodd: Motu Proprio
Fr Zuhlsdorf: WDTPRS
Fr Longenecker: Standing On My Head
Elizabeth Scalia: The Anchoress
First Thoughts
Mirror of Justice
Rorate Cæli
Veritas Rex
Middle East & Muslim affairs
Eteraz
Iraq the Model
Lebanese Political Journal
Michael Totten
Michael Yon
General interest
Althouse
Ambiance
Chris Muir's Day by Day
Instapundit
IowaHawk
JAC
Professor Bainbridge
Prettier than Napoleon
Rachel Lucas
The Right Coast
Science Blog
Sippican Cottage
Whatever
This web page (via Metafilter) attempts to match you to a candidate for 2008. As with the feminism test posted yesterday (and as is inherent to all such tests), it's got some problems, but unlike so many of these tests, it takes into account not only your views on a list of issues, but on the importance you place on each subject, which is certainly a step forward. Of course, it still doesn't work, but conceptually, including such weighting is a step forward, and they've got time to improve the engine and the question list before the primaries.
My top scoring Republican was....
John McCain. (hmm...)
Bottom scoring Republican: Ron Paul. (Got that right at least.)
Top scoring Democrat: Joe Biden
Bottom scoring Democrat: Kucinich (Got that right too.)
Sounds fairly correct
Giuliani Paul
Clinton Gavel
Personally undecided about Giuliani/McCain, otherwise correct.
I wonder what Bloomberg would do if added to the mix.
Very Interesting
If I put in my personal opinions, I get Kucinich far above anyone else (40), but I oppose much of it on the federal level which, unsurprisingly, gives me Paul. However, Kucinich is only one point below. Paul is the top Republican either way.
Too bad neither has much chance of winning the primaries.
Awful questionnaire
I thought the questionnaire was extremely limited. Almost the only issues which I felt strongly about, given that this is a campaign for President rather than state legislator or even Congressman, were the ones related to the Iraq war or the war on terror. (ok, I also picked my opposition to Kyoto as "important," along with my support for No Child Left Behind, supporting a citizenship path for illegal immigrants, and opposition to "universal healthcare".) For everything else, I picked a side, but expressed the importance of the issue as "meh."
There were no questions about judicial appointments, no questions about taxation, no questions about global trade issues, no questions about overturning McCain-Feingold. Nor were there any questions about foreign policy anywhere outside Iran and Iraq. What about Russia? China? North Korea? Our NATO allies? The proper role of the UN? All these are very important issues, to me, in selection of the President. Embyronic stem cells, gay marriage, they generate much heat but have relatively little consequence on our daily lives and the issues which the President particularly is charged with handling.
Another example of apostasy.
"Embyronic stem cells, gay marriage, they generate much heat but have relatively little consequence on our daily lives"
Heretic!
:-)
Just remember, Rich...
If my local Party chairman asks, I never said that! lol
Deal, but....
..if MY local chairman asks me who I've turned in this week you are toast!
ROFLMAO!
Good one, Rich!
It is awful, but...
somehow it did accurately measure my preferences. Awful for many of the reasons you stated.