StubbornFacts
Stubborn Facts
Stubborn Facts

Navigation

User login

Subscribe via RSS

Resources

The latest from our partner, the PoliGazette

Blog Roll

Which candidate, I

Submitted by Simon on Fri, 08/10/2007 - 7:55am

This web page (via Metafilter) attempts to match you to a candidate for 2008. As with the feminism test posted yesterday (and as is inherent to all such tests), it's got some problems, but unlike so many of these tests, it takes into account not only your views on a list of issues, but on the importance you place on each subject, which is certainly a step forward. Of course, it still doesn't work, but conceptually, including such weighting is a step forward, and they've got time to improve the engine and the question list before the primaries.

My top scoring Republican was....

John McCain. (hmm...)

Bottom scoring Republican: Ron Paul. (Got that right at least.)

Top scoring Democrat: Joe Biden
Bottom scoring Democrat: Kucinich (Got that right too.)

Sounds fairly correct

Giuliani Paul

Clinton Gavel

Personally undecided about Giuliani/McCain, otherwise correct.

I wonder what Bloomberg would do if added to the mix.

Very Interesting

If I put in my personal opinions, I get Kucinich far above anyone else (40), but I oppose much of it on the federal level which, unsurprisingly, gives me Paul. However, Kucinich is only one point below. Paul is the top Republican either way.

Too bad neither has much chance of winning the primaries.

Awful questionnaire

I thought the questionnaire was extremely limited. Almost the only issues which I felt strongly about, given that this is a campaign for President rather than state legislator or even Congressman, were the ones related to the Iraq war or the war on terror. (ok, I also picked my opposition to Kyoto as "important," along with my support for No Child Left Behind, supporting a citizenship path for illegal immigrants, and opposition to "universal healthcare".) For everything else, I picked a side, but expressed the importance of the issue as "meh."

There were no questions about judicial appointments, no questions about taxation, no questions about global trade issues, no questions about overturning McCain-Feingold. Nor were there any questions about foreign policy anywhere outside Iran and Iraq. What about Russia? China? North Korea? Our NATO allies? The proper role of the UN? All these are very important issues, to me, in selection of the President. Embyronic stem cells, gay marriage, they generate much heat but have relatively little consequence on our daily lives and the issues which the President particularly is charged with handling.

Another example of apostasy.

"Embyronic stem cells, gay marriage, they generate much heat but have relatively little consequence on our daily lives"

Heretic!

:-)

Just remember, Rich...

If my local Party chairman asks, I never said that! lol

Deal, but....

..if MY local chairman asks me who I've turned in this week you are toast!

ROFLMAO!

Good one, Rich!

It is awful, but...

somehow it did accurately measure my preferences. Awful for many of the reasons you stated.

Recent comments

Advertisements
StubbornFacts.us does not endorse the content of any advertisement

Featured Movie

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 6 guests online.