StubbornFacts
Stubborn Facts
Stubborn Facts

Navigation

User login

Subscribe via RSS

Resources

The latest from our partner, the PoliGazette

Blog Roll

"They didn’t choose the circumstances of this race. Their job is to cope with them."

Submitted by Simon on Tue, 08/19/2008 - 10:51am

David Brooks:

McCain started his general-election campaign in poverty-stricken areas of the South and Midwest. He went through towns where most Republicans fear to tread and said things most wouldn’t say. It didn’t work. The poverty tour got very little coverage on the network news. McCain and his advisers realized the only way they could get TV attention was by talking about the subject that interested reporters most: Barack Obama.

McCain started with grand ideas about breaking the mold of modern politics. He and Obama would tour the country together doing joint town meetings ... [but] Obama vetoed the town meeting idea. ...

McCain and his advisers have been compelled to adjust to the hostile environment around them. They have been compelled, at least in their telling, to abandon the campaign they had hoped to run ... [and t]he man who hopes to inspire a new generation of Americans now attacks Obama daily. It is the only way he can get the networks to pay attention.

Some old McCain hands are dismayed. John Weaver, the former staff member who helped run the old McCain operation, argues that this campaign does not do justice to the man. The current advisers say they have no choice. They didn’t choose the circumstances of this race. Their job is to cope with them.

And the inescapable fact is: It is working. Everyone said McCain would be down by double digits at this point. He’s nearly even. Everyone said he’d be vastly outspent. That hasn’t happened. A long-shot candidacy now seems entirely plausible.

As the McCain’s campaign has become more conventional, his political prospects have soared. Both he and Obama had visions of upending the system. Maybe in office, one of them will still be able to do that. But at least on the campaign trail, the system is winning.

Yep.

Added: Even the WaPo sees the slant in coverage.

Not to start a ruckus or anything, but isn't McCain basically

saying that he had a commitment to running a non-negative campaign, but he backed away, in order to get elected? I mean, isn't this similar to the Obama's flip on public financing, with the only major difference being that McCain didn't sign a pledge? I'm not really making a big deal out of this, as I knew the "uplifting campaign" idea sadly wouldn't last, and Obama's house isn't exactly clean either, but it's just interesting the way things play out.

"In the world you will find tribulation, but be of good cheer, for I have overcome the world."

John 16:33

The old "moral high ground"

The old "moral high ground" vs "Whatever it takes" dilemma.

I still see the campaign as basically like previews of upcoming movies. They may promise a lot and /or sound exciting but often the real feature falls short. So that's why I rely on the "who's the Director?" question. That helps establish the track record. And in this case the McCain director has a good track record; the Obama director is just making the transition from MTV videos to feature length films.

Chris

The only time I ever saw

The only time I ever saw both candidates actually STAY "high road" through an entire campaign, it was when the underdog was running as a ticket-filler in a safe district.

Recent comments

Advertisements
StubbornFacts.us does not endorse the content of any advertisement

Featured Movie

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 4 guests online.