StubbornFacts
Stubborn Facts
Stubborn Facts

Navigation

User login

Subscribe via RSS

Resources

The latest from our partner, the PoliGazette

Blog Roll

Heh.

Submitted by Tully on Sun, 11/16/2008 - 9:33am

Divvying Up the Spoils

Glenn Reynolds finally notices something that's become increasingly obvious since I first posted on it right after the election.

HOPE AND CHANGE! "I'm actually beginning to think had Hillary won there would be fewer Clinton retreads coming on-board."

Plus, from The New York Times: "The selection of Mr. Emanuel and other veterans of President Bill Clinton’s administration to run the transition stood in contrast to Mr. Obama’s message about finally moving beyond the Clinton era."

UPDATE: Well, at least there won't be a bunch of Skull-and-Bones types running things. Oh, wait. . . .

ANOTHER UPDATE: Dan Riehl thinks the Clintonista influx is a good thing, and I agree. It's just not very changey.

I think it's somewhat of a good thing too, for many of the same reasons Riehl puts forth. To put it another way, it could be worse. LOTS worse. That will not prevent me from noticing the ongoing real-world process of The Game As It Is Really Played. After all, plus ça HopeyChange®, plus c'est la même chose!

UPDATE: Another Clintonista joins the O-team.

BONUS UPDATE: Chris Cilliza has a great short take in WaPo today on the bogus myth-narratives of this election season. I don't necessarily concur in every little detail, but I certainly do in general. Worth your time.

smelly pile of meme chose

Well I think if you asked 1000 democrats whose era Obama wanted to move past, they'd say Bush, not Clinton. I'm sure you're right that Obama must have talked about the Clintons as something to move beyond, but not so much as he ran against Bush.

Anything that encourages me to keep hoping Obama will try to govern from the center is all to the good. I've always expected that Obama would have little choice but to disappoint the wingiest fringe. My guess is that he tries to get through one or two little symbolic pilot programs for thing like National Service, and that's about it. In my experience, that's been a presidential staple, little token pilot programs. As you say, meme chose. [I don't do latin, but I do French. Thank you for not calling me a surrender monkey.]

As someone who still wants a soupcon ofmoderate "hopey change," I count myself a pube's width less cynical than you, Tully. Not that I don't smile when I think of naive lefty college activists (like the ones who accost me with clipboards on Boylston street in Boston) getting their noses rubbed in a smelly pile of meme chose. :-)

BTW, about Rahm Emmanuel being a lefty as you claimed. Since I had already heard he did a stint as something of an investment banker, I thought "hmm, a lefty investment banker?, what a queer creature." So I did a quick check of his liberal rankings from his congressional stint. He was like 130-something. Not exactly Karl Marx.
________
I have often said, and oftener think, that this world is a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel. -Horace Walpole

Someone has to be freakin'

Someone has to be freakin' Karl Marx or even farther left to be a leftie in your book? Talk about guaging by extremes! Bill Clinton hisself described Emanuel as a vicious gutter fighter and Chicago/Daley machine tool. Obama gets a two-fer there, a home-turf hit man with Clinton connections. It is a mistake to think that because someone is not a naive campus pamphleteer that they are somehow not off to one side of center, even if willing to surrender some ideological purity for personal power and cash. I mean, Luca Brasi may not have held the same detailed philosophy of life as Vito Corleone, but there was no mistaking whose side he was on.

You've never met a left-of-center investment banker? Um, exactly what group again is sucking out $700 billion in taxpayer loans to cover their asses? And why? Was it because of their conservative business practices? Double-heh. They only get guaranteed conservative when you go after THEIR money...they are happy to be quite liberal to get yours.

Here, a quote from G. Gordon Liddy seems clarifying:

A liberal is someone who feels a great debt to his fellow man; a debt he proposes to pay off with your money.

That may be the only time you ever see me quote G. Gordon, but he was right on there. In any case, since you missed or dodged the not-so-subtle point, I'll state it overtly. I told you so. Months ago, and ever since. Repeatedly. In detail, even.

[P.S.: Je ne parle pas francais! ;-) ]

Recent comments

Advertisements
StubbornFacts.us does not endorse the content of any advertisement

Featured Movie

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Who's online

There are currently 3 users and 4 guests online.

Online users

  • Pat
  • bucyrus
  • Simon