StubbornFacts
Stubborn Facts
Stubborn Facts

Navigation

User login

Subscribe via RSS

Resources

The latest from our partner, the PoliGazette

Blog Roll

The insanity of Olberman's suspension

Submitted by Simon on Fri, 11/05/2010 - 2:16pm

Keith Olberman has been suspended from anchoring his op/ed show "Countdown." After network President Phil Griffin "became aware" that Olberman had donated money to Democrat candidates this election cycle, and "[m]indful of NBC News policy and standards," Griffin "suspended [Olberman] indefinitely without pay."

At first blush, this is all to the good: Olberman is vile, a poison to public discourse, and so there's a certain satisfaction seeing him get slapped. Alas, on closer inspection, it's Griffin who's the jerk in this story. Just what are those policies and standards that Olberman violated? "Anyone working for NBC News who takes part in civic or other outside activities may find that these activities jeopardize his or her standing as an impartial journalist because they may create the appearance of a conflict of interest. Such activities may include participation in or contributions to political campaigns or groups that espouse controversial positions."

Is this a joke? How could anything jeopardize the "standing as an impartial journalist" of Keith Olberman, who is one of the most viciously partisan hacks ever to defile a television studio? Olberman is paid to be partial, and now he's being suspended for endangering an impartial reputation that he's never had? You might as well fire Elmo for being red.

Bill Kristol sums it up: "First, he donated money to candidates he liked. He didn’t take money, or favors, in a way that influenced his reporting. Second, he’s not a reporter. It’s an opinion show. If Olbermann wants to put his money where his mouth is, more power to him." For Griffin's story to stick, you'd have to believe that he has no idea what kind of show "Countdown" is, despite being President of the network on which it airs.

Phil: Unsuspend Keith, and fire him for the right reasons (viz. being a talentless, uncouth jackass).

You know what, I'll admit--my kneejerk reaction was that

this was probably a good thing. My next reaction was that this seems quite ridiculous. Now, as is well-known, Olbermann is a raving lunatic, and has a tendency (or rather, a natural reflex) to go off th deep end. No one in their right mind would mistake him for anything but a partisan (same as Beck or Hannity, BTW), so the rule seems silly to me.

ADDED: Apparently the rule is that you can make donations if you let the higher ups know in advance, and Olbermann did not. Stupid rule. Unsuspend him.

BTW, I suspect this might have been done to make a statement about Fox, where they endorse candidates openly over there. On the air.

Rafique said:

"BTW, I suspect this might have been done to make a statement about Fox, where they endorse candidates openly over there."

I never quite understand why people have no problem with newspapers having this dual role as news provider and endorser, but they have kittens when TV news does it. There is something kinda quaint about the concern; it's a throwback to the 1950's when lots of people were uneasy with a new medium. I feel like saying, "It's been 60 years folks. Isn't it time to make peace with television?"

I mean, my only issue is this networks need to be upfront about

their biases. Ideally, all news outfits ought to follow standards of journalism, but to the extent that they have biases, just come out with it. You're fooling no one.

Recent comments

Advertisements
StubbornFacts.us does not endorse the content of any advertisement

Featured Movie

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 3 guests online.