Demographics & Economics
OMB
Congressional Budget Office
The Federal Budget
U.S. Census Quickfacts
Inflation Calculator
CIA World Factbook
NationMaster
State Healthcare Facts
UN HDR stats
US Bureau of Economic Analysis
US Bureau of Labor Statistics
US CDC health stats
US DOJ Bureau of Justice Statistics
US DOJ crime stats
Constitution
The Constitution
The Founders' Constitution
The Avalon Project
The Federalist Papers
The antifederalist papers
Founding documents
Politics
ADA (liberal) Voting Records
ACU (conservative) Voting Records
Census Voter Turnout
Congressional Research Service
Memeorandum
NOW list of voting scorecards
PolitiFact
PorkBusters
Project VoteSmart list of voting scorecards
RealClearPolitics
Roll call votes--House
Roll call votes--Senate
Survey USA
WaPo Votes Database
Iraq/Terrorism
CentCom
Brookings Institute Iraq Index
Project on Defense Alternatives War Report
Nat'l Defense Univ Iraq
Nat'l Defense Univ Afghanistan
MERLIN, Nat'l Defense Univ Library Network
STRATFOR
Nat'l Memorial Inst for Prevention of Terrorism
West Point's Combating Terrorism Center
Politics blogs
Baldilocks
Blue Mass Group
Cadillac Tight
California Conservative
Jon Chait
Confederate Yankee
Crooked Timber
Democracy Project
Dinocrat
First Read
Gateway Pundit
GenerationPatriot
Horse Race Blog
Just One Minute
Hugh Hewitt
Michelle Malkin
Patterico's Pontifications
Power Line
Red State
RNCC blog
Scrappleface
Sister Toldjah
Talking Points Memo
The Blogometer
The Corner
The Next Right
The Moderate Voice
Think Progress
Wizbang
Moderate / centrist
Ambivablog
Bipartisan Rules
Booker Rising
Centerfield
Charging RINO
Donklephant
Liberal War Journal
Militant Moderates
The Buck Stops Here
The Glittering Eye
The Iconic Midwest
The PoliGazette
The Walrus Said
Legal & academic
How Appealing
Becker-Posner
Bench Memos
Concurring Opinions
Economists Do It With Models
Legalities
Prawfsblawg
SCOTUSblog
Sentencing Law & Policy
UCFB
The Volokh Conspiracy
Christian
Archbp Dolan: Gospel in the Digital Age
Bp Chris Coyne: Let Us Walk Together
ADW blog
Simon Dodd: Motu Proprio
Fr Zuhlsdorf: WDTPRS
Fr Longenecker: Standing On My Head
Elizabeth Scalia: The Anchoress
First Thoughts
Mirror of Justice
Rorate Cæli
Veritas Rex
Middle East & Muslim affairs
Eteraz
Iraq the Model
Lebanese Political Journal
Michael Totten
Michael Yon
General interest
Althouse
Ambiance
Chris Muir's Day by Day
Instapundit
IowaHawk
JAC
Professor Bainbridge
Prettier than Napoleon
Rachel Lucas
The Right Coast
Science Blog
Sippican Cottage
Whatever
According to Glenn Reynolds and Ed Whelan, Jack Goldsmith's books is hardly the devastating insider espose you'd think from the initial reaction in the leftosphere:
Many people think the Bush administration has been indifferent to wartime legal constraints. But the opposite is true: the administration has been strangled by law, and since September 11, 2001 this war has been lawyered to death. ... In my two years in the government, I witnessed top officials and bureaucrats in the White House and throughout the administration openly worrying that investigators acting with the benefit of hindsight in a different political environment would impose criminal penalties on heat-of-battle judgment calls. The[y] ... did not believe they were breaking the law, and indeed they took extraordinary steps to ensure that they didn't. But they worried nonetheless because they would be judged in an atmosphere different from when they acted.... Why, then, do they even come close to the legal line? ... Why not play it safe? ... [Because] play[ing] it safe before 9/11 ... contributed to the paralyzing risk aversion that pervaded the White House and the intelligence community ... [before 9/11, which] made playing it safe no longer feasible.
Whelan concludes with an observation that ought to sober the nutsroots; even if you elect a Democrat, don't look to them to roll back what this administration has done. "If anything, the next Democratic President — having digested a few threat matrices, and acutely aware that he or she alone will be wholly responsible when thousands of Americans are killed in the next attack—will be even more anxious than the current President to thwart the threat….”"
The secret Reid doesn't understand.
In my post "The 'war' is a cover", I point out that Democrats who insist the war is about illegal invasions, the fallacy of pre-emption, Rovian designs to drive Liberals crazy and requiring soley the alternative strategy of police action and UN sanctions to contain real global threats are barking up the wrong tree. The last election was not about the quick exit from Iraq or a repudiation of how most intelligence experts see the world.
I don't expect Hillary to castrate Executive power or discredit the concept of military force when other options have run their reasonable course. Based on what I think Clarke and others told Hillary during the Clinton years, a long struggle is on the menu for the West regarding terrorism and the nexus of WMD and extremist/criminal organizations. Most Democratic candidates foresee an extended stay in Iraq and our leading General seems opposed to troop cuts now in Iraq. I ask M.R. to give us his fiction of where we would be now had the US not removed Saddam and followed what the nutroots think is in order.
I haven't heard one Democrat defend Bush's remarks to Roh (nor say good job), while claiming for months that Bush had forgotten the "other" North Korean nuclear programs. Instead, North Korea responded and invited the US, China and Russia to inspect those programs and promised to verify their closing by the end of the year. The Democrats would like all to see the world in their vision of black and white, but I wouldn't expect Hillary or even Obama once elected, to drink the Kool Aid. The burden of terror will be upon their backs and they will need bi-partisan support to respond to attacks. They are coming. Every candidate knows it and so does a waking Europe.
Yeah, that sounds about right,
"If anything, the next Democratic President ? having digested a few threat matrices, and acutely aware that he or she alone will be wholly responsible when thousands of Americans are killed in the next attack?will be even more anxious than the current President to thwart the threat?.?"
At least in the sense that the Democratic candidate will not go as far as the nutroots and far-left want, and move away from the overall post 9/11 paradigm. Reasonable safeguards will be in place, as they should, but at the end of the day, for all the complaints about the Patriot Act, not much will really be taken out.
"In the world you will find tribulation, but be of good cheer, for I have overcome the world."
John 16:33