Demographics & Economics
OMB
Congressional Budget Office
The Federal Budget
U.S. Census Quickfacts
Inflation Calculator
CIA World Factbook
NationMaster
State Healthcare Facts
UN HDR stats
US Bureau of Economic Analysis
US Bureau of Labor Statistics
US CDC health stats
US DOJ Bureau of Justice Statistics
US DOJ crime stats
Constitution
The Constitution
The Founders' Constitution
The Avalon Project
The Federalist Papers
The antifederalist papers
Founding documents
Politics
ADA (liberal) Voting Records
ACU (conservative) Voting Records
Census Voter Turnout
Congressional Research Service
Memeorandum
NOW list of voting scorecards
PolitiFact
PorkBusters
Project VoteSmart list of voting scorecards
RealClearPolitics
Roll call votes--House
Roll call votes--Senate
Survey USA
WaPo Votes Database
Iraq/Terrorism
CentCom
Brookings Institute Iraq Index
Project on Defense Alternatives War Report
Nat'l Defense Univ Iraq
Nat'l Defense Univ Afghanistan
MERLIN, Nat'l Defense Univ Library Network
STRATFOR
Nat'l Memorial Inst for Prevention of Terrorism
West Point's Combating Terrorism Center
Politics blogs
Baldilocks
Blue Mass Group
Cadillac Tight
California Conservative
Jon Chait
Confederate Yankee
Crooked Timber
Democracy Project
Dinocrat
First Read
Gateway Pundit
GenerationPatriot
Horse Race Blog
Just One Minute
Hugh Hewitt
Michelle Malkin
Patterico's Pontifications
Power Line
Red State
RNCC blog
Scrappleface
Sister Toldjah
Talking Points Memo
The Blogometer
The Corner
The Next Right
The Moderate Voice
Think Progress
Wizbang
Moderate / centrist
Ambivablog
Bipartisan Rules
Booker Rising
Centerfield
Charging RINO
Donklephant
Liberal War Journal
Militant Moderates
The Buck Stops Here
The Glittering Eye
The Iconic Midwest
The PoliGazette
The Walrus Said
Legal & academic
How Appealing
Becker-Posner
Bench Memos
Concurring Opinions
Economists Do It With Models
Legalities
Prawfsblawg
SCOTUSblog
Sentencing Law & Policy
UCFB
The Volokh Conspiracy
Christian
Archbp Dolan: Gospel in the Digital Age
Bp Chris Coyne: Let Us Walk Together
ADW blog
Simon Dodd: Motu Proprio
Fr Zuhlsdorf: WDTPRS
Fr Longenecker: Standing On My Head
Elizabeth Scalia: The Anchoress
First Thoughts
Mirror of Justice
Rorate Cæli
Veritas Rex
Middle East & Muslim affairs
Eteraz
Iraq the Model
Lebanese Political Journal
Michael Totten
Michael Yon
General interest
Althouse
Ambiance
Chris Muir's Day by Day
Instapundit
IowaHawk
JAC
Professor Bainbridge
Prettier than Napoleon
Rachel Lucas
The Right Coast
Science Blog
Sippican Cottage
Whatever
President Bush will talk to President Putin today about his remarks earlier in the week threatening to test the theory that supply creates demand by targeting Europe with Russian nuclear weapons if America creates a missile defense grid for Europe. "The White House has insisted the shield is planned to block any future Iranian nuclear missiles, not Russian ones." If the shield's supposed to stop missiles from rogue states, why not attempt defuse the situation by offering to extend the shield not just over Europe, but over Russia? Why not offer to bring them in as a full partner if we don't regard the Russians as being part of what the shield's supposed to defend against, and why wouldn't they agree if they have no hostile intentions?
Added: apparently we've already offered and they've already said no, but their reasoning seems pretty thin. So now their motivation really starts to look somewhat suspect.
It's not in their interests
It's simply not in their interests to do so. They're not terribly worried that Iran will lob a nuke into their backyard. Iran knows that the odds of Russia retaliating to a major terrorist MWD strike with a nuke is FAR higher than the odds of us doing so. A missile shield doesn't buy them much new protection at all.
They also know that from the standpoint of an all-out nuclear exchange, we'd probably benefit more from a missile shield than they would because we can afford to build more nukes than they can. Putin cannot afford to engage in an arms build-up like the one which ultimately helped crush the Soviet economy in the late 1980s. With current technology, a missile shield will have a decent chance at stopping one or two rogue missiles, but will not be able to stop dozens coming through at once. Thus if, God forbid, there were ever a mass exchange of nukes, more of ours would be more likely to make it through their shield, simply because we'd have more. Not to mention that the shield itself will probably be very pricey, and they may not be able to afford to take part in it.
Beyond that, Russia has no interest in partnering with America against any other part of the world. From their point of view, such partnerships come with way too many strings attached, and anyway they are tired of not being seen (and feared) as a superpower any more. They'll oppose us on some thing just for the sake of opposing us.