Sandy Berger is trying to stuff the truth down his pants all over again

I don't particularly have much to add to the subject heading on this post. I just really have been wanting to hear someone say those words, then decided it may as well be me.

My quick point is this: no matter what happens now in the saga of ABC's "Path to 9/11" miniseries -- whether it's pulled or simply slightly bowdlerized -- the frantic actions of all those slamming it have already provided the American people with their biggest take-away theme: That when it comes to fighting terrorism, the Democrats just seem to have something to hide.

Anyway, for those looking to catch up, here's a nifty synopsis of the brouhaha related to the movie by John Miller at National Review.

UPDATE: For an all together different take on the film and the kerfuffle over it, and in the interest of fairness, see the NY Post's resident neocon (and sometime movie critic) John Podhoretz review, in which he defends both Berger and Albright (but not Clinton), and pans the film on aesthetics and substance.