StubbornFacts
Stubborn Facts
Stubborn Facts

Navigation

User login

Subscribe via RSS

Resources

The latest from our partner, the PoliGazette

Blog Roll

Trust Us! (Not Really)

Submitted by Tully on Sat, 10/27/2007 - 12:52pm

"You f***ed up. You trusted us!"

TPMmuckraker has the whole sorry tale.

D'Oh: House Panel Screw-Up Reveals Whistleblower Email Addresses

This summer the House Judiciary Committee launched an effort to collect tips from would-be whistleblowers in the Justice Department. The U.S. attorney firings scandal had shown that much was amiss in the Department, and with the danger of retaliation very real, the committee had set up a form on the committee's website for people to blow the whistle privately about abuses there. Although the panel said it would not accept anonymous tips, it assured those who came forward that their identity would be held in the "strictest confidence."

But in an email sent out today, the committee inadvertently sent the email addresses of all the would-be whistleblowers to everyone who had written in to the tipline. The committee email was sent to tipsters who had used the website form, including presumably whistleblowers themselves, and all of the recipients of the email were accidentally included in the "to:" field -- instead of concealing those addresses with a so-called blind carbon copy or "bcc:".

...Compounding the mistake, the committee later sent out a second email attempting to recall the original email; it, too, included all recipients in the "to:" field, according to a recipient of the emails.

Just to really cheer up all the would-be whistleblowers, one of the recipients of both emails was the public email address of the Vice President's office. So remember, kiddies. If you're a government employee and you leak classified programs to the mainstream media, some in Congress will do their damndest to help hide you from prosecution for that felony, and to protect your media accomplices. But if you're want to whine about the bosses to Congress, you may end up in the skilled and able hands of John Conyers and crew. And they'll help you in their own special way.

D'oh!!

"In the world you will find tribulation, but be of good cheer, for I have overcome the world."

John 16:33

conflation special

If you're a government employee and you leak classified programs to the mainstream media, some in Congress will do their damndest to help hide you from prosecution for that felony, and to protect your media accomplices. But if you're want to whine about the bosses to Congress, you may end up in the skilled and able hands of John Conyers and crew.

I think that a combination of a pet peeve of yours and and some innate cynicism has led you to make an iffy comparison. Is there any evidence that the mistake was not really a mistake? If the answer is no, then it seems to me you're conflating malice (intent) on the one hand with incompetence on the other. Surely you don't really want to imply that malice correlates with competence, do you?

Or maybe you do, in a sense. I can see how one might think that Congress would put the boobs in charge of the stuff they don't really care that much about (whistleblower privacy) while putting skilled and ruthless hardball players in charge of cherished partisan chicanery.

__________
I have often said, and oftener think, that this world is a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel. -Horace Walpole

You missed it. I'm saying

You missed it. I'm saying that the people who are willing to shield you from prosecution for national security leakage by passing laws to make you hard to prosecute are too incompetent to shield your identity if you leak to them.

Technical is really human.....

follow up

What Tully said seems a real concern, though Democrats probably found the profanity going to Cheney more amusing.

Recent comments

Advertisements
StubbornFacts.us does not endorse the content of any advertisement

Featured Movie

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 4 guests online.