Demographics & Economics
OMB
Congressional Budget Office
The Federal Budget
U.S. Census Quickfacts
Inflation Calculator
CIA World Factbook
NationMaster
State Healthcare Facts
UN HDR stats
US Bureau of Economic Analysis
US Bureau of Labor Statistics
US CDC health stats
US DOJ Bureau of Justice Statistics
US DOJ crime stats
Constitution
The Constitution
The Founders' Constitution
The Avalon Project
The Federalist Papers
The antifederalist papers
Founding documents
Politics
ADA (liberal) Voting Records
ACU (conservative) Voting Records
Census Voter Turnout
Congressional Research Service
Memeorandum
NOW list of voting scorecards
PolitiFact
PorkBusters
Project VoteSmart list of voting scorecards
RealClearPolitics
Roll call votes--House
Roll call votes--Senate
Survey USA
WaPo Votes Database
Iraq/Terrorism
CentCom
Brookings Institute Iraq Index
Project on Defense Alternatives War Report
Nat'l Defense Univ Iraq
Nat'l Defense Univ Afghanistan
MERLIN, Nat'l Defense Univ Library Network
STRATFOR
Nat'l Memorial Inst for Prevention of Terrorism
West Point's Combating Terrorism Center
Politics blogs
Baldilocks
Blue Mass Group
Cadillac Tight
California Conservative
Jon Chait
Confederate Yankee
Crooked Timber
Democracy Project
Dinocrat
First Read
Gateway Pundit
GenerationPatriot
Horse Race Blog
Just One Minute
Hugh Hewitt
Michelle Malkin
Patterico's Pontifications
Power Line
Red State
RNCC blog
Scrappleface
Sister Toldjah
Talking Points Memo
The Blogometer
The Corner
The Next Right
The Moderate Voice
Think Progress
Wizbang
Moderate / centrist
Ambivablog
Bipartisan Rules
Booker Rising
Centerfield
Charging RINO
Donklephant
Liberal War Journal
Militant Moderates
The Buck Stops Here
The Glittering Eye
The Iconic Midwest
The PoliGazette
The Walrus Said
Legal & academic
How Appealing
Becker-Posner
Bench Memos
Concurring Opinions
Economists Do It With Models
Legalities
Prawfsblawg
SCOTUSblog
Sentencing Law & Policy
UCFB
The Volokh Conspiracy
Christian
Archbp Dolan: Gospel in the Digital Age
Bp Chris Coyne: Let Us Walk Together
ADW blog
Simon Dodd: Motu Proprio
Fr Zuhlsdorf: WDTPRS
Fr Longenecker: Standing On My Head
Elizabeth Scalia: The Anchoress
First Thoughts
Mirror of Justice
Rorate Cæli
Veritas Rex
Middle East & Muslim affairs
Eteraz
Iraq the Model
Lebanese Political Journal
Michael Totten
Michael Yon
General interest
Althouse
Ambiance
Chris Muir's Day by Day
Instapundit
IowaHawk
JAC
Professor Bainbridge
Prettier than Napoleon
Rachel Lucas
The Right Coast
Science Blog
Sippican Cottage
Whatever
I'm second to none in my support for the Bush tax cuts, both on principle (it's our money, not the government's) and on pragmatic grounds (lower tax rates after 2001 helped the economy bounce back after 9/11). But my highest priority is always to get the numbers right, to look at the right statistics, to consider all the angles.
Powerline is one of my favorite blogs, and they are usually right on target. Most of their recent post, Eeyore Covers the Budget is right on. The New York Times is always pessimistic about the economy during Republican administrations and optimistic during Democratic ones, and their story on the budget tomorrow is no different, despite the unusually (for the Times) upbeat headline. But Powerline, relying on a budget presentation by Treasury Secretary John Snow, gets one key point wrong.
The Times reports: "Democrats and many independent budget analysts note that overall revenues have barely climbed back to the levels reached in 2000," which John Hinderaker says is "ridiculous". Hinderaker relies on a chart presented by Secretary Snow showing that tax revenues are up by some $130 billion. This is one of those talking past each other things which really annoys me in political analysis. Both the Times report and Secretary Snow are correct, though I think the Times report (and it pains me to say this) is the more accurate way to look at the numbers. Here's what's going on:

The pink numbers are Secretary Snow's, the dark blue, the Times'. Secretary Snow used current dollars, not adjusted for inflation. The Times adjusted for inflation, showing constant FY2000 dollar values.
Comparing revenues and expenditures over several years makes no sense in current, unadjusted dollars, as inflation alone would make it look like revenues had increased even if the buying power of those revenues stayed exactly the same. I think the adjusted numbers still look plenty good and amply illustrate that the real cause of the budget deficit is skyrocketing spending, not the Bush tax cuts.
Raw data on the budget is available at the Office of Management and Budget. The figures in the chart above are taken from the historical tables for the FY 2007 executive budget [massive pdf warning].