Demographics & Economics
OMB
Congressional Budget Office
The Federal Budget
U.S. Census Quickfacts
Inflation Calculator
CIA World Factbook
NationMaster
State Healthcare Facts
UN HDR stats
US Bureau of Economic Analysis
US Bureau of Labor Statistics
US CDC health stats
US DOJ Bureau of Justice Statistics
US DOJ crime stats
Constitution
The Constitution
The Founders' Constitution
The Avalon Project
The Federalist Papers
The antifederalist papers
Founding documents
Politics
ADA (liberal) Voting Records
ACU (conservative) Voting Records
Census Voter Turnout
Congressional Research Service
Memeorandum
NOW list of voting scorecards
PolitiFact
PorkBusters
Project VoteSmart list of voting scorecards
RealClearPolitics
Roll call votes--House
Roll call votes--Senate
Survey USA
WaPo Votes Database
Iraq/Terrorism
CentCom
Brookings Institute Iraq Index
Project on Defense Alternatives War Report
Nat'l Defense Univ Iraq
Nat'l Defense Univ Afghanistan
MERLIN, Nat'l Defense Univ Library Network
STRATFOR
Nat'l Memorial Inst for Prevention of Terrorism
West Point's Combating Terrorism Center
Politics blogs
Baldilocks
Blue Mass Group
Cadillac Tight
California Conservative
Jon Chait
Confederate Yankee
Crooked Timber
Democracy Project
Dinocrat
First Read
Gateway Pundit
GenerationPatriot
Horse Race Blog
Just One Minute
Hugh Hewitt
Michelle Malkin
Patterico's Pontifications
Power Line
Red State
RNCC blog
Scrappleface
Sister Toldjah
Talking Points Memo
The Blogometer
The Corner
The Next Right
The Moderate Voice
Think Progress
Wizbang
Moderate / centrist
Ambivablog
Bipartisan Rules
Booker Rising
Centerfield
Charging RINO
Donklephant
Liberal War Journal
Militant Moderates
The Buck Stops Here
The Glittering Eye
The Iconic Midwest
The PoliGazette
The Walrus Said
Legal & academic
How Appealing
Becker-Posner
Bench Memos
Concurring Opinions
Economists Do It With Models
Legalities
Prawfsblawg
SCOTUSblog
Sentencing Law & Policy
UCFB
The Volokh Conspiracy
Christian
Archbp Dolan: Gospel in the Digital Age
Bp Chris Coyne: Let Us Walk Together
ADW blog
Simon Dodd: Motu Proprio
Fr Zuhlsdorf: WDTPRS
Fr Longenecker: Standing On My Head
Elizabeth Scalia: The Anchoress
First Thoughts
Mirror of Justice
Rorate Cæli
Veritas Rex
Middle East & Muslim affairs
Eteraz
Iraq the Model
Lebanese Political Journal
Michael Totten
Michael Yon
General interest
Althouse
Ambiance
Chris Muir's Day by Day
Instapundit
IowaHawk
JAC
Professor Bainbridge
Prettier than Napoleon
Rachel Lucas
The Right Coast
Science Blog
Sippican Cottage
Whatever
Oh boy: "[A]dvisors to Barack Obama are pressing ahead with plans for a nonpartisan commission to investigate alleged abuses under Bush."
One response might be that an investigation is not necessarily a precursor to prosecutions, and so this isn't problematic. When a given behavior has the potential to be either beneficial or harmful, we shouldn't conclude that we have to put a stop to it just because it could become pathological, writing off any benefits that might have accrued. I emphasized that in two posts this year, in the contexts of voter ID laws and executive power; see also Frank Easterbrook, The Chicago School and Exclusionary Conduct, 31 Harv. J. of L. & P.P. 439, 441 (2008) (in the antitrust context, "[i]nstead of making predictions that are impossible to test - and will injure consumers if wrong - [enforcers should] wait to see what happens. If monopolistic prices happen later, prosecute then").
This situation is a little different. Although I agree that, in abstracto, an investigation is not an inherently bad thing, this does not take place in a vacuum, and we know a great deal about the motivations and views of the players involved. This investigation has an uncommonly high probability of turning into something ugly, and a strong chance of turning into something pathological (investigations beget prosecutions, even if only prosecutions ancillary to the original object: for example, Plame, Whitewater, etc.). Moreover, it's hard to see what benefits could possibly accrue even if he investigation stays on the rails.
I suppose that we will find out, because there's little we can do to stop this if President Obama chooses to press ahead. The two most troubling aspects here arise from what the story confirms: that minds on the left remain focused on going back and performing a full cavity search on the Bush administration. First, this will surely bring into the public record matters that should not be in the public record; it will not be an in camera investigation whose results will be sealed for the duration of hostilities. And second, significant pressure now comes to rest on the President Bush to head off the inevitable politically-motivated prosecutions that will arise from that investigation by issuing a blanket pardon, which strikes me as the stuff of banana republics.
Post facto:
On the other side of the web today (12/16/08)
Now my ribs hurt
"...a nonpartisan commission..."
Now my ribs hurt from laughing so hard.
The criminalization of ordinary politics is indeed the stuff of banana republics, and is far more to be feared than any change of administration.
0 and three
And I just heard Newt Gingrich say "tripartisan." So clearly partisan and bipartisan just aren't cutting the rhetorical mustard anymore. :-)
Agreed though, this witchhunt is likely a waste of time and other resources. My guess and hope is that all it amounts to is talking big early just to please the aluminum haberdashers watching so eagerly right now.
Then by the time it actually amounts to nothing, these folks will be so disappointed by the democratic failure to legislate utopia into existence that it won't matter. Just another indignity for the true believers on their way back to the desert, Maybe I'm just silly to think that there are enough grown-ups among democrats who understand the need for prez prerogatives and who can carry the day. I hope not.
__________
I have often said, and oftener think, that this world is a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel. -Horace Walpole
Somehow Newt thinks
Somehow Newt thinks independents are an actual party, or at least a coherent faction of the electorate.
won't contest
I won't contest you on the coherence issue, However, I think it's a very savvy move for politicians to explicitly include this portion of the populace in their public comments.
Many Americans who no longer strongly identify with either party are eager to finally be considered as a force to be reckoned with, I think.
__________
I have often said, and oftener think, that this world is a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel. -Horace Walpole
Savvy to give the idea lip
Savvy to give the idea lip service, perhaps. But that's all it is (or can be) is lip service. Like trying to herd cats without a can opener.
Who said there's no can
Who said there's no can opener though? Surely there's an issue or two that can be picked off and opened up as a tasty morsel, giving off aroma of sardine and mackerel, to certain groups of cats among the independents?
tempting snacks
Right. It's the 21st century, they even have little snacks that cats go wild for. Where's the harm in identifying and highlighting that portion of the conservative approach that might appeal to independents.
For example, there's that democrat I have heard is suggesting that tax exemptions for 401ks have been a failure. That might be a good place to start. Of course, who wants to think about their 401k these days?
__________
I have often said, and oftener think, that this world is a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel. -Horace Walpole
See "coherent." A few can
See "coherent." A few can always be picked off, but there's no coherncy or cohesion among indies as a whole. Which is why "tri-partisan" is such a laughably moronic phrase. Kinda my whole point there.
Yeah, I agree. If there is some legit reason that comes up to
investigate past misdeeds then fine, but I do fear that this has the potential to morph into a full-scale waste of energy at the least, and an overreaxh at the worst. Let's hope this iis just bravado, or idle talk at this point. It was a continual point of frustration for me that so many righties were still obsessed with Bill Clinton even after he left office, and I hope the Left doesn't make the same mistake, although I fear some won't be satisfied until Bush and Cheney are arrested for war crimes.
"In the world you will find tribulation, but be of good cheer, for I have overcome the world."
John 16:33
Rafique, good luck with
Rafique, good luck with that. But they're trying real hard to make sure nothing happens to them by asking for detailed life histories from ALL applicants for jobs in the new administration.
And when I say detailed, I mean really really detailed. Many of these questions would evoke an immediate "F*** you and the horse you rode in on! MYOFB!" response from any normal American.
This from Mr. HopeChange® who personally did his very best to keep much of his own life obscure.
Only with the outfielders
If Obama is bringing back Clintonistas into his inner circle 1) he's already broken his "change" promise and 2) they have more skeletons than most cemeteries.
If they persue "war crimes" tribunal I'll be sickened. I do not think there is anything guilty, a good chunk of the Dems approved W going to war in Iraq in 2002, and it will be the beginning of the end of the US as a stable power as we can prosecute our challengers. We won't be any different than Colombia.
Rachel
I brew the beer I drink
I haven't done my own count
I haven't done my own count so I can't vouch for it, but those who have been watching say that former Clinton admin officials are 31 out of Obama's first 46 named picks. Shame, if you were Hope®ing for Change®.
And if people were hoping for more Clinton, then they should have, well, voted for Clinton.
Post-partisan?
If Barak Obama really wants to go "post-partisan" he needs to show some leadership and just say let it go even if there was a legit reason. The only reason is a fishing expedition. I thought the right was wrong to continue harping on Clinton after the fact.
At some point, some intelligence has to come up and say we have a lot more important things to be dealing with. If the Obama administration goes along with this fiasco, I will say screw it and go partisan myself since it doesn't matter anymore. If there is a time to man up and show the words are not hollow, now is the time for Obama to tell the loonies to go jump in a lake and get over it because he has a country to fix. That would probably do a lot to get me believing in him. However, since I feel deep down he is a partisan hack, I expect him to go right along with this malarkey.
Maybe he should just pardon Bush and Cheney a la Ford just to end the nightmare.
The scapegoating urge is
The scapegoating urge is hard to overcome. It's so much easier than actully leading. Here's hoping.
Roger Simon has some
Roger Simon has some relevant comments.