Demographics & Economics
OMB
Congressional Budget Office
The Federal Budget
U.S. Census Quickfacts
Inflation Calculator
CIA World Factbook
NationMaster
State Healthcare Facts
UN HDR stats
US Bureau of Economic Analysis
US Bureau of Labor Statistics
US CDC health stats
US DOJ Bureau of Justice Statistics
US DOJ crime stats
Constitution
The Constitution
The Founders' Constitution
The Avalon Project
The Federalist Papers
The antifederalist papers
Founding documents
Politics
ADA (liberal) Voting Records
ACU (conservative) Voting Records
Census Voter Turnout
Congressional Research Service
Memeorandum
NOW list of voting scorecards
PolitiFact
PorkBusters
Project VoteSmart list of voting scorecards
RealClearPolitics
Roll call votes--House
Roll call votes--Senate
Survey USA
WaPo Votes Database
Iraq/Terrorism
CentCom
Brookings Institute Iraq Index
Project on Defense Alternatives War Report
Nat'l Defense Univ Iraq
Nat'l Defense Univ Afghanistan
MERLIN, Nat'l Defense Univ Library Network
STRATFOR
Nat'l Memorial Inst for Prevention of Terrorism
West Point's Combating Terrorism Center
Politics blogs
Baldilocks
Blue Mass Group
Cadillac Tight
California Conservative
Jon Chait
Confederate Yankee
Crooked Timber
Democracy Project
Dinocrat
First Read
Gateway Pundit
GenerationPatriot
Horse Race Blog
Just One Minute
Hugh Hewitt
Michelle Malkin
Patterico's Pontifications
Power Line
Red State
RNCC blog
Scrappleface
Sister Toldjah
Talking Points Memo
The Blogometer
The Corner
The Next Right
The Moderate Voice
Think Progress
Wizbang
Moderate / centrist
Ambivablog
Bipartisan Rules
Booker Rising
Centerfield
Charging RINO
Donklephant
Liberal War Journal
Militant Moderates
The Buck Stops Here
The Glittering Eye
The Iconic Midwest
The PoliGazette
The Walrus Said
Legal & academic
How Appealing
Becker-Posner
Bench Memos
Concurring Opinions
Economists Do It With Models
Legalities
Prawfsblawg
SCOTUSblog
Sentencing Law & Policy
UCFB
The Volokh Conspiracy
Christian
Archbp Dolan: Gospel in the Digital Age
Bp Chris Coyne: Let Us Walk Together
ADW blog
Simon Dodd: Motu Proprio
Fr Zuhlsdorf: WDTPRS
Fr Longenecker: Standing On My Head
Elizabeth Scalia: The Anchoress
First Thoughts
Mirror of Justice
Rorate Cæli
Veritas Rex
Middle East & Muslim affairs
Eteraz
Iraq the Model
Lebanese Political Journal
Michael Totten
Michael Yon
General interest
Althouse
Ambiance
Chris Muir's Day by Day
Instapundit
IowaHawk
JAC
Professor Bainbridge
Prettier than Napoleon
Rachel Lucas
The Right Coast
Science Blog
Sippican Cottage
Whatever
Amanda Marcotte has a three-page web article in Salon in which she copiously demonstrates why she should never have been hired in the first place. (You have to suffer through a short web commercial for the full access required to suffer through the rest.)
Why I had to quit the John Edwards campaign
I realized that I couldn't handle the stress of having people flinging an endless stream of baseless accusations at me without being able to come out and defend myself, so I resigned from the campaign.
Marcotte has a little history of flinging things herself, using vulgarity and vituperation in much the same fashion that annoyed primates utilize their excretions. Given open "prime time" access in Salon, she manages to confirm that she's definitely not ready for prime time, with the fecal fallout beginning in short order.
She does manage to get to the second page before throwing the first f-bomb. As to be expected, it's all the fault of the male Godarchy* fascist Godbag Patriarchy and the Right-Wing Smear Machine, intent on smothering any legitimate feminist voices in the political arena. Her own egocentric "coarse, comedic vernacular," readily apparent anger management problem, near-psychotic rants and smugly histrionic tantrums were, of course, not in the least to blame.
[*--someone emailed to note that my nomenclature was somewhat inaccurate, and begged me to correct it. Done!]
By "baseless accusations" she means her own words.
...And by "baseless accusations," she means her own words, in context.
There's an old political
There's an old political saying about heat and kitchens, but to even mention that particular Trumanism would no doubt be considered "sexist" by Marcotte. :-)
Althouse
Professor Althouse sorta kinda came to Marcotte's defense, in a "she's exaggerating, but there's some underlying truth there" way. Althouse is certainly correct that some of the comments attacking her (mostly from the left) are thinly veiled sexism, but Marcotte is the wrong person to defend here. Note my comments at the very beginning of Althouse's comment thread.
And this, keep in mind, is a
And this, keep in mind, is a partial defense from a woman who's been on the receiving end of more than one of Marcotte's attacks. She's a class act.
the best take
The best take I've read on this is from Cathy Young. She had the experience of a previous battle with Marcotte, and so she took the time to respond in detail to criticisms Marcotte leveled at her.
pandagate and anti-male bigotry
I was shocked by how, well, utterly deranged Marcotte is. She takes the art of "in other words you think that " to a new level.
I was wrong. She doesn't deserve any benefit of a doubt or a chance to become a mature commenter, and her hiring reflects extremely poorly on Edwards and his campaign.
What bothers me most is the relentlessly illogical insistence on having it both ways. If you don't respect x, and say so virulently and repeatedly, admit that you don't respect x when you get called on it. Or at least clarify excaclt what aspects of x you don't respect...
....for example, when Simon calls Barack Obama "Obambi" or you call the NY Times the Teheran Times, that's not respectful, right? But so waht? You've both cheerfully and proudly acknowledged your lack of respect, and supported it in detail. And you've taken the time to say that there are certain specific aspects of each that you don't respect or have trouble with. Simon doesn't think Obama is pure evil, he just believes that the centrist portion of his rhetoric will bear liberal fruit. You don't think everything the NY Times does is wrong, you just thik that the predominace of liberal staffers colors its framiong of political issues, etc.
Those are the sorts of things good critical thinkers take the time and energy to do, and Marcotte is someone who clearly can't be bothered to do so.
Now what she's doing is mounting a campaign to get elected to the celebrity victim hall of fame, so she can preserve a bit of spotlight. Pathetic stuff.
Re the cute nicknames,
Re the cute nicknames, they're at least partially tongue-in-cheek, but here's the other thing: no one here is working for a person running to be President of the United States. And if you think I go after Obama with some venom, you want to see how Marcotte goes after someone. By comparison, I'm a grass snake and she's a king cobra.
What her "reasoning" boils down to....
...is that she left the Edwards campaign because staying would have interfered with her ability to play the "victim."
Tragic. Simply tragic.